Tomorrow (March 4) marks the occasion of what would have been actor John Garfield’s centennial birthday. To commemorate this event, Patti at They Don’t Make Them Like They Used To is hosting The John Garfield Centennial Blogathon, a four-day look at the movies and career of—if I may interject a personal note—one of my favorite movie actors. The films discussed and the participants can be found here…and the following is Thrilling Days of Yesteryear’s contribution.
John Garfield’s contract with Warner Bros. officially came to an end in 1946. The studio had catapulted the stage actor to silver screen success in films like Four Daughters (1938) and The Sea Wolf (1941), but they also insisted on casting him in B-pictures and potboilers like They Made Me a Criminal (1939) and Dust Be My Destiny (1939)…so like his stable mates Bette Davis and Olivia de Havilland, Garfield fought with the studio constantly over appropriate pictures and roles. As such, a great deal of Garfy’s time at the studio resulted in suspensions when the two opposing forces (Garfield and WB) could not come to terms. In that same year, Julie declared his independence (one of the first Hollywood stars to do so) by co-founding The Enterprise Studios with David L. Loew and Charles Einfeld…and their first success was a boxing film starring Garfield called Body and Soul (1947—released by United Artists), directed by Robert Rossen.
The scriptwriter for Body
and Soul, Abraham Polonsky, got his chance to sit in the director’s chair
with the second of the two films Garfield
made for Enterprise : Force of Evil (1948). Polonsky also co-wrote the screenplay for the
film along with Ira Wolfert, who was the author of the novel on which the film
was based, Tucker’s People. Force
of Evil, a box office failure upon its initial release, has since come to
be recognized as a film noir classic…and in 1994, was selected the Library of
Congress’ National Film Registry for those films that are “culturally,
historically, or aesthetically significant.”
It is also my favorite John Garfield film.
In the movie, Garfield
plays Joe Morse—a street-smart attorney who supplies counsel to racketeer Ben
Tucker (Roy Roberts). Both men have been
working on a plan to consolidate and control “the numbers racket”—an illegal pari-mutuel
system based on racetrack results in New York City—and ambitiously turn it into
a legitimate operation much like a lottery or sweepstakes. To accomplish this, they will arrange for the
number 776 to be the winner of a July 4th race, gambling that superstitious
players will bet on the significant digits…and when the “banks” (those
individuals who take the bets) go belly up because they can’t cover the losses,
Tucker and Company will generously offer to make good by taking them over.
Joe’s brother Leo (Thomas Gomez) is the owner of one of
these small banks (as Joe explains: “…they were like banks because money was
deposited there—they were unlike
banks because the chances of getting money out
were a thousand-to-one”)…and because Joe owes him a debt of gratitude (Leo put
him through law school after their parents died), he’s arranged for his brother’s
bank to be spared the fate of the other small timers, who’ll be left to their
own devices. The problem for Joe is that
Leo has waved off his offer to join Tucker’s operation—despite the fact that
they’re essentially in the same business; Leo has nothing but contempt for
Tucker while believing himself a honorable man.
When Leo spurns Joe’s entreaties for the final time, Joe arranges for
his brother’s bank to be raided by the police.
The gendarmes round up Leo and his “employees,” including a young woman
named Doris Lowry (Beatrice Pearson), who minutes before gave her notice to Leo
but was unlucky to be caught up in the net.
Joe, out of loyalty to his brother and interest in Doris ,
magnanimously bails them all out in the hopes that Leo will see the light.
Tucker’s most pressing problem arrives in the form of rival Chicago
gangster Bill Ficco (Paul Fix)—who was shut out when Tucker took over the beer
concession in New York City during Prohibition, but is determined to get a slice
of the numbers pie. One of his goons (Stanley
Prager) asks Bauer to set up a meeting between Leo and Ficco…and at this
meeting, Leo is kidnapped and Bauer is shot and killed. Tucker then informs Joe—who’s furious about
the news of his brother—that like it or not, he’s bringing in Ficco to alleviate
the eventual heat from the special prosecutor.
That’s when Ficco tells Joe that Leo is dead…and after Morse arranges
for the prosecutor’s office to hear all this via a wiretapped telephone, a
shootout leaves both Tucker and Ficco in the same place as Leo.
Joe, having learned that Leo’s body was dumped on some rocks
by the Hudson River , runs to the spot where Leo’s corpse
lies accompanied by Doris . Seeing his brother’s remains tossed away “like
an old dirty rag,” Joe decides he will cooperate with the special prosecutor
and take what’s coming to him with Doris providing moral
support.
In Body and Soul,
John Garfield plays a boxer who sells his soul to become a success by aligning
himself with racketeers; in Force of Evil,
Julie plays a lawyer who sells his soul to become a success by aligning himself
with racketeers. The two films pretty
much act as bookends (so if you haven’t seen either film, you’d be well advised
to watch Body before Force) with Force offering what I
believe is the quintessential Garfield character—an educated man of the streets
who achieves redemption after having to adjust his moral compass.
Body and Soul has
probably the bleaker ending of the two films.
The subject matter isn’t particularly daring (corruption in the fight
game—quelle surprise!) but at its
conclusion, when pugilist Charlie Davis (Garfield )
is threatened by his crooked manager (Lloyd Gough) after Davis
announces his intention to quit Charlie shoots back: “What are you gonna do? Kill me? Everybody
dies…” (The implication is, yes, Davis
won’t be long for this world after the Sweet Science Powers That Be get through
with him.)
Force of Evil has
a bit more optimism in its ending, but remains a much more fascinating film
because of its bold assertion that there is no discernible difference between
legitimate and illegitimate business (the movie even begins with a shot of Wall
Street—which in light of recent events over the past several years makes Force quite prescient). The goon assigned to approach milquetoast
bookkeeper Bauer even takes offense when Freddie spits out the word “gangsters”
to him. “What do you mean, 'gangsters'?”
the hood asks Bauer. “It’s business!” It also harkens back to a time when the
concept of lotteries wasn’t embraced by as many people today (who justify them
by touting the good they do, funding education and the like)—Joe Morse explains
that the racket was called “policy” because lower income people used the
nickels and dimes to play the numbers rather than putting it toward their
insurance (policy) premiums.
The bleak worldview of Force
of Evil is the responsibility of director-writer Abraham Polonsky, who
never made any bones about being an avowed Marxist…and that’s what got him in
trouble with the House Un-American Activities Committee in 1951. (Polonsky wouldn’t directed another film
until Tell Them Willie Boy is Here
in 1969 as a result of being blacklisted.)
For Polonsky, there was no distinction between the two arenas of crime
and business—since brothers Joe and Leo Morse have been so poisoned by a
money-and-power-driven capitalistic society they have no other recourse but to
make crime pay. Leo (a first-rate
performance from character great Gomez) is one of the most fascinating
characters of any noir film: a man who truly believes that he’s doing no harm
with his small-time numbers racket (he runs the operation, according to Joe, “the
way another man runs a restaurant or a bar”) and that he’s far more decent than
a shark like Tucker. His devoted wife
Sylvia (Georgia Backus) even insists on referring to him as a “businessman”:
LEO: I’ve been a businessman all my
life…and honest—I don’t know what a
business is…
SYLVIA: But you had a garage…you
had a real estate business…
LEO: A lot you know…real estate business…living from
mortgage to mortgage…stealing credit like a thief…and the garage! That
was a business! Three cents overcharge
on every gallon of gas…two cents for the chauffeur and a penny for me…penny for
one thief, two cents for the other…well,
Joe’s here now—I won’t have to steal
pennies anymore…I’ll have big crooks
to steal dollars for me!
Polonsky often referred to Force of Evil as an “autopsy on capitalism,” and his and Wolfert’s
screenplay hasn’t lost any of its audacious Marxist content: that people are
the product of their environment (having been born in the slums, both Leo and
Joe haven’t really been able to escape; Joe may be a little luckier but he’s
still rubbing shoulders with crooks), that capitalism breeds decadence (the
interior of the courthouse in certain scenes is practically indistinguishable
from those set against the backdrop of Leo’s “bank” in the slums) and that the
interaction of different classes ultimately results in conflict. Polonsky sort of stopped short in addressing
a solution to the corruption brought on by the capitalist system, however—preferring
to fall back on the old Hollywood maxim of “Don’t sell
out.” (And really…when you think about
the film afterward: Garfield ’s
character agrees to turn informer—which is kind of out-of-step with the actor’s
sticky situation when he was called upon to testify before HUAC, too.)
I love the poetry of Polonsky and Wolfert’s script (written
in blank verse and choc-a-bloc with Biblical allusions to Cain and Abel, Judas,
etc.) and how the crisp, “street” dialogue is delivered by Garfield (“I didn’t
have enough strength to resist corruption…but I was strong enough to fight for
a piece of it”), Gomez, Roberts and the other characters to perfection. I’ll confess that while I’m not quite sure
what Marie Windsor was supposed to bring to the film outside of portraying
Roberts’ slut-puppy wife (who’s on the make for Garfield) the noir siren is
always a welcome presence, and there’s great contributions by character faves Barry
Kelly (as a “bus inspector”), Jack Overman, Tim Ryan (surprisingly effective as
one of Roberts’ hoods) and Sid Tomack (as the “human calculator” hired to make
sure “776” hits). The cinematography by George
Barnes (who was given by Polonsky a book of Edward Hopper’s Third
Avenue paintings to achieve the “look” the
director wanted) is quite striking (I also marvel at how Barnes films the
characters so that they are dominated by their surroundings) and the score by
David Raksin moodily effective.
But at the risk of being a gushing fanboy, Force of Evil is my favorite Garfield
film and I’ve made no secret of my admiration for the actor over the many years
I’ve been scribbling things down in this little scrap of the blogosphere. The street background of the characters he
played in his many films couldn’t be disguised, and yet Julie always seemed to
have a little more Moxie on the ball, coupled with a troubled wonderment as to
whether or not he was “doing the right thing.”
In films like Out of the Fog (1941) and Nobody Lives Forever (1946), he made unlikable characters likable
with a vulnerability, a boyish charm and an animal magnetism that was
attractive to both men and women; in vehicles like The Fallen Sparrow (1943), The Postman Always Rings Twice (1946), Humoresque (1946), Body and Soul, Gentleman’s Agreement (1947), We Were Strangers
(1949), The Breaking Point (1950)
and He Ran All the Way (1951) he
literally lights up the screen. I don’t
think there’s a Garfield film I don’t like…well, maybe with the
exception of Tortilla Flat (1942).
Force of Evil
finally got the DVD treatment in 2004 on a
disc released by the now-defunct Artisan company—but last year it was
resurrected by Olive Films, who secured the rights to many of the properties
owned by Republic Pictures. Republic
obtained the four-picture output of The Enterprise Studios, which soon went out
of business due to the bad b.o. for both Force
and Joan of Arc (1948); their last
release was another underrated noir, Caught
in 1949. I can’t vouch for the Olive
Films release but I was kind of hoping they would have included the intro that
Scorsese did for the videocassette version (in addition to Pursued, Johnny Guitar
and A Double Life) to remind me of
when I fell under the spell of my favorite Garfield film so many years ago.
16 comments:
Ivan, what an incredibly awesome review of what, for me, is a complicated, confusing movie. I've only seen the film once, and I rated it 3 stars, but I said in my review of it that it could have been 4 had I understood it more. (The "numbers racket" is quite over my head.) Anyhow, thanks to your review, I understand the film better and, thus, won't be as confused the next time I watch it.
For the record, I don't care a great deal for "Tortilla Flat" either, though I think Garfield was terrific in the role of Danny. For me, the only "don't like it" Garfield film is "We Were Strangers," and that is because I dislike Jennifer Jones. She ruins everything for me (Holden film, Clift films, and Cotten films to name a few).
"The Breaking Point" is my favorite Garfield film, but several others aren't far behind.
Also, just have to say...while "our Julie" was great in this role, Thomas Gomez surely was up to the task of going head-to-head with him. He was amazing.
Thanks so much for participating in the blogathon. This piece was a wonderful addition to the event!
A really wonderful review and appreciation of both the film and Garfield. This was the kind of role that Garfield was made for and he is letter perfect. Too bad he was just a minute ahead of his time and never lived to catch up.
For me, the only "don't like it" Garfield film is "We Were Strangers," and that is because I dislike Jennifer Jones.
Years ago on the blog, I jokingly created what I call The Blind Squirrel Theory of Film™--which posits that no matter how much I may dislike an actor or actress, there’s at least one movie of theirs I don’t mind watching (it’s a reference to the old maxim “Even a blind squirrel finds a nut now and then”). There’s not a lot of love for Jennifer Jones here at TDOY but I really do like her in We Were Strangers; she gives a first-rate performance. (She’s also not bad in Beat the Devil—but that’s a discussion for another day.)
I’ve also not yet found a film that applies to Margaret O’Brien…but also, too: that is getting off the subject. If I had a little more time, I would have written something on Strangers…alas, it was not to be.
"The Breaking Point" is my favorite Garfield film, but several others aren't far behind.
I would definitely agree that Breaking Point is the actor’s best film. But best is different from favorite, so that’s why I went with Force of Evil. :-)
I liked your referring to the poetry in the script. Along with its strong political bent, it is what elevates it from the pack of crime pictures. That it is your favourite says a lot. I'm not sure what, but ... a lot.
Great review. Also, from the Sesame Street researchers end, note the waiter looking aghast while pouring coffee during a big "hit" scene:
http://images.wikia.com/muppet/images/e/eb/Willlee-forceofevil.jpg
Yes, it's Will Lee, aka Mr. Hooper before he decided to set up shop in a quieter neighborhood, where the only mobsters trafficked in hot letter O's.
Why do you call Garfield 'Julie'?
Rich wondered out loud:
Why do you call Garfield 'Julie'?
I'm not the only one, but the reason is that Garfield was born (Jacob) Julius Garfinkle before he changed his name for the movies. Garfield's daughter is also named Julie, which admittedly causes some confusion.
Fantastic review, Ivan! I really enjoyed not only the depth of your post, but how you juxtaposed FORCE OF EVIL with BODY AND SOUL. Glad to see you spotlight Thomas Gomez for some much-deserved praise. That guy was always good value on screen. (Love his work as gum-popping thug to Edward G. Robinson's Johnny Rocco in KEY LARGO especially).
And yours is yet another rave for THE BREAKING POINT. It seems I really need to catch up with that film - if only to compare it to my beloved TO HAVE AND HAVE NOT.
I definitely haven't seen this one but, like Patti, sometimes these plots send my head spinning! If I do catch it I'll have to do a re-read of this first, so I know what's going on! It sounds like an intriguing film though.
Thank you, for your wonderful review for a film, I have not yet seen. Your review of this film makes is sound like an above average film...
Ivan, a terrific and impressively detailed post on a film that plainly means a lot to you. I'm also a fan of Garfield; he's one of my ten favorite actors of the studio days. I think "Body and Soul" is is his best film and performance, but this one is not far behind and though his character has many familiar Garfield traits (which you describe fully), it also offers something more in that he's a kid from the slums who's risen above that world but still has his feet planted in it.
You and those who left comments made many great observations. Here are some I am in accord with: Thomas Gomez is wonderful in this film, as he was in "Key Largo" and especially "Ride the Pink Horse," both made about the same time (he got an Oscar nom for supporting actor for "Horse"). "Tortilla Flat" is a travesty of Steinbeck's novel, turning the characters into colorful Latino eccentrics, wasting Garfield, and saddling the great Spencer Tracy with perhaps the worst performance I've ever seen him give. "Force of Evil" is impressively photographed by Hitchcock regular George Barnes and stands as a very polished example of film noir; I recall Scorsese's enthusiasm from his "Journey Through American Film" documentary. Beatrice Pearson made little impression on me either.
For me Garfield's greatest period is bookended by "Pride of the Marines" and this film with "The Breaking Point" (which I'm writing on for the blogathon) thrown in a bit later. Anyway, knowing your enthusiasm for Garfield, I wasn't surprised to see you taking part in the blogathon, and you chose what I consider the most challenging of all his films to write on. A great job.
Must agree this is one of Garfield's greatest films and up there with 'Body and Soul' - I am very interested in the parallels you draw between the two. I love the blank verse dialogue of this film which helps to give it such a haunting quality. You have done a great job in explaining the sometimes confusing plot of 'Force of Evil' and showing how it criticises capitalism through the depiction of the 'numbers racket'. I really need to see this film again and will be referring back to this posting.
Nice one, Ivan, thanks.
Late to the party (right, when wasn't I, but I'll try to make it worth the wait).
Garfield said in interview somewhere that the key to his Force of Evil character is hanging right there on Joe Morse's vest pocket-- a Phi Beta Kappa key that Garfield picked up somewhere. It functioned for Garfield as a sort of imprimatur of legitimacy for the character Joe Morse has assumed: an ivy league attorney, with a briefcase and everthing, and not some cheap thug.
Despite the fact I loved the movie, I also got the sense that it was a limited budget and shot quickly, and there were some scenes that could have done with another take (most of them involving Beatrice Pearson, by the way, who sometimes seems to be simply reciting phonetically learned syllables into her shoetops).
When I first saw the movie, I wondered hm, which Producer is she sleeping with? and wonder if you may have wondered the same thing-- having given her the name "Beatrice Roberts" in your fourth paragraph-- or do you know something we don't?
Again, thanks for the nice write-up.
When I first saw the movie, I wondered hm, which Producer is she sleeping with? and wonder if you may have wondered the same thing-- having given her the name "Beatrice Roberts" in your fourth paragraph-- or do you know something we don't?
Nah, that's just an incident of "late-night-brain-fart." I fixed it.
That's a great review! Force of Evil was my frst Garfield film, and I enjoyed it a lo, proof that John's talent was being wasted in B-movies. I was surprised to see a Brazilian classic movie, shot six years after this, and called something like In the Way of Crime, that had a strong influence o this film.
Don't forget to read my contribution to the blogathon! :)
Greetings!
It's hard to picture Garfield as a middle-aged player:his acting-persona was that of a dynamic young man and that electricity that he bought to his material (which was so often otherwise mediocre) surely couldn't have lasted much longer (or, if it did remain, would have been lessened by coming from a paunchy, older man).
Post a Comment