The following is Thrilling Days of Yesteryear’s contribution to The Barbara Stanwyck Blogathon, hosted by Aubyn at The Girl with the White Parasol from July 16-22. For a list of participants and the movies to be discussed, please click here. Also, too: I’ve done what I can not to reveal the ending of this movie…but on the off chance you’ve not seen it (or have no familiarity with its source material) I will warn you there be spoilers.
“In the tangled networks of a great city, the telephone is the unseen link between a million lives...” – from the opening crawl of the film
Wealthy heiress Leona Cotterell Stevenson (Barbara Stanwyck)—known
as “The Cough Drop Queen” in reference to her father’s (Ed Begley)
pharmaceutical empire—is all alone in her New York apartment, a bedridden
invalid. She’s desperately trying to get
in touch with her husband Henry (Burt Lancaster) by telephone, and during the
course of her attempts intercepts a conversation between two men discussing
their plans to murder a woman. Leona
tries to report the event to the phone company…and then to the police; both
institutions claim they are helpless to do anything without any additional
information.
Leona continues to try and contact Henry through a series of
increasingly frantic phone calls. In the
course of her bedroom inquiries, she speaks with her husband’s secretary
(Dorothy Neumann)…who tells her of a mysterious lunch date he had with a woman
identifying herself as “Mrs. Lord.” Mrs.
Lord is the married name of Henry’s old flame (and Leona’s former rival) Sally
Hunt (Ann Richards), who clues Leona to an investigation involving Henry that Mr. Lord (Leif
Erickson) is pursuing—having to do with shady activities involving Henry, a
company chemist named Waldo Evans (Harold Vermilyea) and a racketeer named
Morano (William Conrad). After a series
of labyrinthine flashbacks that also involve conversations with Evans and Leona’s
physician (Wendell “Hic!” Corey), Leona learns to her horror that the murder
being planned will hit a little too close to home.
Producer Hal Wallis wanted to make a movie version of the
play at Paramount, and commissioned Fletcher to flesh out the half-hour script
in 1947. Fletcher decided to borrow a
technique that worked well for her friend Orson in Citizen Kane (1941); namely, telling the story of how Leona Stevenson
happened to be lying helpless in bed on the night of that fatal phone
call through flashbacks. The studio needed a bigger name
than Moorehead to play the part (Aggie was more of a character actress despite
the fact she originated the role on radio ferchrissake) and first approached
Laraine Day…who turned them down, since she was scheduled to work on My Dear Secretary (1948) at the same
time. Paramount decided on Barbara
Stanwyck for the part.
For years, I always had trouble with Stanwyck in this role—only
because I just couldn’t reconcile the ball busting dame from Double Indemnity (1944) and The File on Thelma Jordon (1950) as a
helpless invalid. Also—I would have loved
to see Aggie play Leona. The studio
offered her a smaller part in the film, and one can only assume Moorehead sent
them a bucket of sand and some pounding instructions; though she was
disappointed in not getting the part, she did receive some comfort in knowing
that Stanwyck insisted on playing a recording of Agnes’ performance on the set
to keep her in the mood.
Having revisited the film several times over the past four
or five years, I’ve changed my mind about Stanwyck’s performance—she’s actually
quite good in the role, and actresses are supposed to take on challenges (that’s
why they call it acting). The Motion
Picture Academy of Arts and Sciences also seemed to think she excelled in the
production because she received a Best Actress Oscar nomination the following
year—the last of her four nods before MPAAS handed her an honorary statuette in
1982. Babs hits all the right hysterical
notes as a woman who slowly begins to realize after putting all of the pieces
of the puzzle together that she’s in mortal danger. (In later years, Stanwyck claimed that the “terror”
from this film is what caused her hair to turn prematurely gray.)
Burt asks the waiter who the dude in the shades is behind him. The server's not sure...but it's actually director Anatole Litvak. |
Sorry, Wrong Number
is considered an example of the style known as film noir—and the use of looming
shadows and flashbacks upon flashbacks upon flashbacks is more than sufficient street
cred. Though it is a tad melodramatic at
times this does not make the film any less suspenseful; there’s a great
sequence where Leona phones the mysterious “Mrs. Lord” at her apartment (the
phone is answered by her son, played by kiddie thesp Jimmy Hunt) and eventually
learns that it’s her old rival. Sally
doesn’t want her husband Fred to know who’s on the other end (we will soon find
out why) and there’s a good deal of palpable tension as Sally first fobs her
off as someone asking about a recipe…until she is later able to break away and
phone Leona from a drugstore, where she explains that Fred is with the District
Attorney’s office. Sally runs out of
change (these were the days before cellphones) and must call Leona a third time
from a phone booth inside the subway…and there’s an edge-of-your-seat moment
when Fred and several other cops arrive, with Fred wanting to make a call from
that same phone booth…
Ann Richards, the actress who plays Sally, seems to get by
more on her accent (she was originally from Sydney) than any true thespic skills…but
I really do like her in this role because I think the accent does add a little
mystery to her character. Husband Fred
is essayed by Leif Erickson, and the presence of Jimmy Hunt as his son will
make you giggle if you’ve ever seen Invaders
from Mars (1953). Other supporting
players in the film do first-rate work: William Conrad, “The Man of a Thousand
Voice,” is in his element as the gangster Morano and his fellow radio thespian
Ed Begley also shines as Leona’s clueless dad.
Then there’s the luckless Wendell Corey…who does manage to escape the
black widow clutches of Stanwyck in this one (he’s not so lucky in Thelma Jordon and The Furies) as the colorless doctor who diagnoses Babs’ illness as
strictly psychosomatic.
Burt Lancaster doesn’t really get his big moment as Henry
Stevenson until the film’s sweat-inducing climax—and for years, I had
difficulty accepting Burt as the henpecked husband because he didn’t seem ready
for those kind of roles at that stage in his career (he licked the problem by
the time he appeared in Come Back,
Little Sheba). Lancaster, in lobbying
producer Hal Wallis for the part, argued that audiences would thrill to see a
strong-looking individual like himself get beaten down. When I re-evaluated
Stanwyck’s performance, I started to give Burt a second glance, too; Babs seems
like the kind of woman who could keep his cojones in a jeweled case, and I love
how effectively this is conveyed during the flashbacks to their honeymoon—Leona
is shown cutting Henry’s champagne intake and waving off a display of public
affection while her vow “I, Leona, take thee Henry” is repeated over and over
again on the soundtrack.
In stretching out her original play to eighty-nine minutes, Lucille Fletcher had a bit of a problem with Mr. Censor, who wasn’t all that keen on the drug trafficking aspect of her original script; the bluenoses also weren’t sold on the idea that Henry would escape the long arm of the law by movie’s end so Fletcher was forced to do a rewrite or two. Fortunately for fans of the radio play, the integrity of Lucille’s memorable final lines are still in the movie; my advice to you is listen to the radio original before unspooling the film…and I think you’ll be pleased with the end result.
I watched this a long time ago when I was on a big Stanwyck kick, but I have to note that I found that first hour kind of dull. There's a lot of backstory there, which they need for the runtime, but not the suspense. I do think the film picks up a lot when it nears the end, though, and that finale is a ball. Great article, you definitely made me want to give it another go. Thanks!
ReplyDeleteThis is a great thriller for sitting on the edge of your seat. I love all of Stanwyck's films. A must see for all her fans!!
ReplyDeleteThanks for reminding about this film!
ReplyDeleteNice post, Ivan. Sorry, Wrong Number is one of Stanwyck's strongest dramatic performances ever. Her ability to perform much of the movie on the phone talking into a receiver and it not seem boring deserves kudos.
ReplyDeleteIt does take a couple of rewatches to accept the performers in these roles, but ultimately it is worth the ride. Fletcher's premise is too solid not to work.
ReplyDeleteIvan, my sister and I liked SORRY, WRONG NUMBER a lot over the years, so I especially enjoyed your detailed and fascinating post! Having only seen Barbara Stanwyck's riveting version, I hadn't that realized Agnes Moorehead, one of Team Bartilucci's favorites, had actually originated the role! Now I've got to find the original radio play! This was a great choice for Aubyn's Barbara Stanwyck Blogathon!
ReplyDeleteI still remember that dark and stormy night when I happened to chance upon Agnes Moorehead's performance of Sorry Wrong Number on a distant AM station. In many ways the story plays out better on radio, but I'm glad Stanwyck was chosen for the film role. She was wonderful. Your write-up makes me want to watch the film again.
ReplyDelete"Sorry, Wrong Number" from "Suspense" should be easy to find; I believe all eight of Moorehead's performances are available online.
ReplyDeleteI'm a big fan of both the radio play and the movie. It is too bad that Agnes Moorehead didn't get the lead in the film; as huge a fan as I am of Stanwyck, I think Agnes would have been utterly mesmerizing. However, Stanwyck is no slouch and she does a terrific job.
ReplyDeleteI still have a little trouble with Burt Lancaster as the husband, but I will keep your points in mind the next time I see this.
I love the radio play! You can get an mp3 version of it here. I've bought a couple dozen radio shows from them over the years, and they're very reliable.
ReplyDeleteThe movie version... I wanted it to be better than it was, I guess. But still, enjoyable!
A real thriller thanks to Stanwyck - I hated her and then I feared for her! Oh - and I really hated Burt in this one. Where areRussell Crowe or Naomi Campbell (champion phone throwers) when you need them?
ReplyDeleteSorry- if this is a repeat...I'm writing from France where the internet is spotty. :) Such a great thriller- Barbara is good, albeit her character a little campy. But it totally works. I was struck the last time I watched it how the technology now would never allow such a riveting idea with the telephone. Another reason to love the classics.
ReplyDeleteThanks for writing- sure enjoyed talking/writing about these wonderful old gems.
I adore this film, and your analysis of it was great. Thanks for posting, Ivan!
ReplyDeleteI saw this one quite recently and found it builds up the tension very effectively - must agree that it is hard at first to accept Stanwyck as the bedridden invalid, but she gives such a powerful performance that she soon convinces. You've put together some great background information here, Ivan - I wasn't aware of the Agnes Moorehead radio version(s) and must now give the play a listen!
ReplyDeleteThis movie was actually the first Stanwyck movie I ever saw. And as a kid, I really had no idea what to make of the thing. I was put off by the nastiness of Stanwyck's character and the weak confusion of Lancaster's. But then I discovered Double Indemnity and began the road to Stanwyck worship.
ReplyDeleteYou give an intriguing analysis of the film and how it compares to the radio version. I wish we had that alternate version with Morehead, even if Stanwyck gives it her all here.
There is a kind of Baby Jane poignancy to Lancaster's final scene. "You mean all this time we could have been friends?" I wonder if Lancaster was inspired by Stanwyck pulling a similar ball-busting turn against Kirk Douglas in The Strange Love of Martha Ivers.
Well done all around, Ivan. You've convinced me to give this one another look. Thanks for contributing so memorably to the blogathon!
Great review. I have always thought Stanwyck great in the role, but sort of think as you, that Lancaster was too macho or strong to play a henpecked husband, and I often thought he was a bit too young to be her husband. I think an older actor who could portray wimpy would have been a bit better. I haven't ever heard the radio version and plan on seeking it out.
ReplyDeleteThis was my first Stanwyck film and I was very surprised. What a great thriller! Barbara could do anything, and she really made me believe in her invalid character.
ReplyDeleteDon't forget to read my contribution to the blogathon! :)
Greetings!
Larraine Day! What were they thinking? Well, since I agree with you about Burt, I suspect they weren't thinking quite hard enough. He's just a few degrees off in the role.
ReplyDelete