It seems like no sooner do I take a second to grab a treat
from the snack room I return to my office and find my inbox full. Among the items on today’s agenda:
my recent nomination for the coveted Liebster Award, bestowed upon me by screenwriter-blogger Dave Enkosky at
KL5-FILM (For All Your Movie Needs). “Liebster,” a German word meaning “favorite,”
has also come to symbolize a certain
excellence in blogging…so the fact that
nearly 5,000,000 blogs have also received this honor within the past two weeks
shouldn’t tarnish its distinction in the least.
(Okay, I’m just having a bit of fun—I really do appreciate Dave passing
this along to me, he's good people.)
Now…normally there is no one in the blogosphere more
enthusiastic than I in keeping a meme going—but I’m really working double-time on
cobbling together a “Coming Distractions” post, so I am going to shamelessly
violate some of the tenets of this award—I need to also explain that I don’t
mean this as a slight to Dave, it’s just that the Distractions pieces do
take up more than the usual amount of blog preparation time. (Those Margaret O’Brien jokes don’t
write
themselves, you know.) The rules applied
to the Liebster are as follows:
1. Each person must post 11 things about themselves.
2. Answer the 11 questions the person who has given the
award has set for you.
3. Create 11 questions for the people you are giving the
award to.
4. Choose 11 people and send them a link to your post.
5. Go to their page and tell them.
6. NO TAG BACKS
Posting things about me is always the difficult part of
these memes because…well, I don’t think there’s anything earth-shattering that
I haven’t already shared with the
TDOY
readership in the past. I do have this
interesting tidbit: I “crossed over” in
the recent
Georgia primary election and voted as a Republican.
Now—before there’s a scrambling for an intervention as folks become convinced
this is one of the Signs of the Apocalypse…I need to point out that the reason
I did so was
because I wanted to vote against a Ga. House legislator—Rep. Doug
McKillip—who was elected as a Democrat in 2006 and then went running for the
tall grass in 2010 by switching parties (McKillip apparently got religion in
2009—whatever his reason, I don’t really give a damn). He put through a draconian anti-abortion bill
in the state House this year that even his Republican primary opponent thought a bit beyond the pale…and so I decided to help her vanquish him,
which she did. (McKillip kind of brought this on himself, really; he foolishly came by the house one day seeking our vote and left to the accompaniment of my father’s derisive laughter.) So I’m not succumbing from Lyme disease or
anything—I just felt like being a supervillain (all I need is a white cat on my
lap to stroke and I’d be in business).
Oh, and I can answer the questions that Dave took the time
to create…don’t want to be a total ingrate…
What's your favorite movie decade?
Probably the 1920s—when the great silent clowns of
yesteryear were at the peak of their filmmaking powers, and when movies made
the (some say unfortunate) decision that they needed to “talk.”.
Warren Oates: awesome actor or awesomest actor?
Oh, Warren was all sorts of awesome sauce…though I don’t
think I could ascribe to him the “awesomest” appellation because I think he
knew he functioned best as the “glue” in each film he appeared in and rarely
aspired to anything more. (Though he was
robbed of an Oscar nomination for Two-Lane
Blacktop.)
What is a movie you wish had a greater following?
I’ve mentioned it on the blog in the past, but I’m a huge
fan of His Kind of Woman. Targets
is another film with which I’d like to see people become more familiar.
What is a movie you feel is unduly praised?
2001: A Space Odyssey. Sorry, folks—it’s like watching paint
dry. (I’d rather watch Quatermass and the Pit.)
What is the proper punishment for people who talk on their cell phones
in a movie theater?
In the afterlife, they will live in a cramped studio apartment with
a DVD player…and a library filled with nothing but Adam Sandler movies. (Maniacal
laugh, strokes cat.)
Which deceased or retired director do you wish could make just one more
movie?
I’d be up for something by Billy Wilder or Preston Sturges.
Are there any movies people are surprised you like?
I don’t think there’s enough bandwidth for a list of films
people have commented: “You liked
that?” (It’d be easier to drop by the
house and have a chat with my father one afternoon.)
How often do you go to the theater?
The last time I saw a film in the theater was in 2008, as
folks who read my submissions to
Dennis Cozzalio’s exams know by now.
Which movie have you seen the most?
Undoubtedly Casablanca. North
by Northwest is a close second, though, followed by Citizen Kane, The Glass Key
and Winchester ’73.
What was your most awkward movie date? (Make one up if you've never had
an awkward movie date)
I’m not sure if I’ve told this story before but my BFF The
Duchess and I once went to a double feature of Friday the 13th and Friday
the 13th 2 at a theater in Huntington, WV
during our college days. She had seen
the first one but remembered nothing about it because her eyes were closed the
entire time—so she kept asking me when she could open her eyes. I foolishly assumed that the movie was over
(but wasn’t aware of the shock at the end—you know which one I mean) and told
her to open ‘em…whereupon she gave out an ear-piercing scream that rendered me
deaf for the next hour or so. (We never
did see the second feature—she ran out of the theater, swearing she’d never see
another horror film.)
What was your best movie date? (Make one up if you've never had a good
movie date)
It wasn’t technically
a date: I knew a woman (also during my Huntington
college days) from a sci-fi club I belonged to and I thought she was a bit of a
flake, to be honest. Anyway, I was
attending an afternoon showing of Key
Largo and before the picture started I looked up to see her standing over
me—she asked if she could sit in the seat next to me because she didn’t know
anybody else in the theater. We ended up
talking quite a bit before Key
Largo started and for about a half-hour afterward; it turned
out that we shared a lot of the same likes and dislikes, movie-wise. I’d like to say there was a happy ending
involved but we never “hooked up” or anything—it did teach me, however, that
you can’t always judge a book by its cover…and that cinema is a universal
language.
The next item on the list involves more shameless
self-promotion: I got an opportunity to watch
Inner Sanctum (1948) yesterday—a noir
that was definitely made on the cheap (hence its inclusion in the great reference
book
Death on the Cheap by Arthur Lyons) but actually wasn’t all that bad for a B-pic:
the acting is better than usual (courtesy of Charles Russell, Mary Beth Hughes
and a few really good character thesps) and there’s a nifty twist ending. You can read a little more about this
neglected gem at
my latest blog post at Radio Spirits if you’re so inclined.
Okay: last instance of tooting my banjo and then I’ll
stop. I mentioned three weeks ago that
according to
TVShowsOnDVD.com (someone saw the
item advertised at DVDEmpire.com) Shout! Factory was planning on releasing a
DVD set entitled
The Jack Benny Program: The Lost Episodes in September…the eleventh,
to be exact, which would work out splendidly for me, birthday-wise. An announcement a few days later then
corrected that September date, stating that the release probably wouldn’t see
the light of day until some time next year.
So that kind of shot my birthday present plans to H-E-double hockey
sticks, and necessitated a backup plan.
I gave some serious consideration to investing in Shout! Factory’s
Route
66 box set—but according to some Amazon.com reviewers and
The Classic TV History Blog’s Stephen Bowie the company made no effort whatsoever to
correct the technical messes made by Infinity Entertainment when they released
the first three seasons to disc. (One
reviewer made me laugh when he mentioned that a Shout! rep named Brian Ward “has
an EXTENSIVE history of lying to Shout's consumers concerning various TV show
releases,” and then followed this bulletin with the news that sugar is sweet.)
After spirited negotiations with the ‘rents (specifically my
mother—Dad kind of acted purely in an “I’m not interested” capacity), I have
arranged to welcome two nice TV-on-DVD box sets into Rancho Yesteryear. One of them has already arrived: it’s the
Timeless Factory Video collection of the 1961-62 crime drama
87th
Precinct, which I am very stoked about (gotta wait until the actual
natal anniversary to tear it open, though).
The other will hopefully get here soon—I decided that the MPI Home Video
release of
The Honeymooners: The Lost Episodes (1951-1957) had to have a
home here (seeing as I already have the classic 39), particularly since I’ve
been seeing them early in the a.m. on Me-TV.
A review at DVD Talk mentions that this is a must-buy, so I’m really
looking forward to devouring its contents.
On a related note: Me-TV has been running a few promos of
late announcing the arrival of Emergency! and Remington Steele to its
fall lineup. I’ve a Han Solo-esque
feeling about these developments, particularly since I’m concerned that some of
my current favorites will be put out to pasture (I’m also worried Me-TV will
start morphing into RTV, which did a similar thing when they couldn’t come to
terms with Viacom).
But back to TV-on-DVD news:
TSOD has the official press release up for Shout! Factory’s
upcoming
Peter Gunn: The Complete Series collection due out October 23rd
(they corrected the number of episodes, too)—I thought about acquiring this
when shopping for presents but I think I’m going to wait for a sale for the
simple reason that I have the first two seasons on Region 2. There’s also
an announcement that Sony Pictures Entertainment will release a honkin’ big box set entitled
Charlie’s
Angels: The Complete Series on September 25th—a 27-disc collection
containing all five seasons (110 episodes) of the iconic 1976-81 T&A crime
drama. The fifth season of
Angels has
not been previously released, and the press release does say that it will be
issued separately in the future for the benefit of those of you who’ve bought
the previous four seasons…but you know me—I’d get it in writing. (This is a set that I won’t lose too much
sleep over not having; I thought the show was inane and would cringe when my
sister Debbie would watch it religiously during its heyday.)
In
split-season CBS DVD-Paramount news, the company
will manage to finish the disc releases of
The Streets of San Francisco on
October 30th with
The Streets of San Francisco: Season 5. Both volumes of this final season will be
released at the same time (*sigh*) and they can either be purchased separately
(at $39.98 SRP each) or as a “shrink-wrapped bundle” for $69.98 SRP. Seems like an awful lot of money to fork over
for a show that no longer had Michael Douglas in it (he left after four
seasons) but then, I’m not a DVD company executive…though oddly enough, I found
myself thinking like one when I was in the voting booth. Hey—now that you guys have finished
San
Francisco—how about some more
Phil Silvers Show
releases so that future generations might know what an incredibly funny sitcom
it was?
Also on the schedule for a future release is the third
season of TV’s
Cannon…and like the old saying goes, I have good news and bad
news. The good news is that CBS DVD
Entertainment has finally wised up and will release William Conrad’s junior
year in a single set—six discs containing all twenty-four episodes of the third
season. The bad news?
Wait for it…
…it’s going to be one of those Amazon CreateSpace MOD
affairs. There’s
a listing already up for it at the giant bookselling behemoth, but still no news as to what date you
can expect it. Poor Bill Conrad…he
deserves better than this injustice.
The final item on the agenda is an event that’s definitely
out of my bailiwick…but I thought there might be some parties in that area interested
in a film series that will be hosted by the UCLA Film and Television Archive,
starting tomorrow at
7:30pm and
continuing through September 28 at the Billy Wilder Theater in
Westwood
Village. It’s called “The Two Faces of Jean,” and the “Jean”
in the title is the lovely Jean Arthur, who will be in several films that are
not easily accessible to classic film fans like
The Defense Rests (1935) and
Most
Precious Thing in Life (1934), and there’ll also be restored prints of such
Arthur favorites as
If You Could Only
Cook (1935) and
The More the Merrier
(1943). (There’ll also be a free
showing of 1939’s
Mr. Smith Goes to
Washington at a Sunday matinee on September 23 at 11am.)
Here’s where you’ll find the details, and
here’s a nice article in the
L.A. Times talking about the event. I wish I could be there.